He has been cursed from pulpits and hailed by scientists. His name has been used for both good and evil; his ideas have spurred incredible scientific progress, leading to rapid advancements in medicine, agriculture, wildlife, and computer science; they have also been used to justify the evils of eugenics and mass murder. His breakthrough in science has been compared to those of Galileo and Newton [1] in recognizing heliocentric theory and gravity, but it is still rejected by many who would rather believe that "Darwinism" is the devil's work.
So who is Charles Darwin to have stirred up so many passions in men?
He was baptized into and taught by the Anglican Church of England. His father wanted him to become a physician, so for a while, he attended medical school. He wasn't fond of medicine, however, so his father ended up sending him to Cambridge to become an Anglican Clergyman. While there, he spent a lot of his time studying nature. It was very popular during that time to seek for evidence of God in science, and at the time, he didn't doubt a literal translation of the Bible. Upon reading some of the popular books of the time dedicated to reconciling God and science, he said that he had a "burning zeal" to contribute to that dialogue.
He spent the rest of his life studying and writing about what he had witnessed, and much of it eventually contributed to the evidence for his theory of Natural Selection. Two years after arriving home, he officially “conceived” of the idea of natural selection and shared the idea with colleagues and friends. He summarized it nicely:
Religious responses to his book were mixed including some who rejected it outright - often scientists, believe it or not - a fair number of clergy who though it a plausible mechanism of God's creation, and still other clergy who accepted it whole-heartedly, claiming that a "miracle" creation is blasphemous to a God who works through laws. Darwin himself thought it “absurd to doubt that a man might be an ardent theist and an evolutionist.” In fact, the very last sentence of his book is a beautifully poetic take on it that could easily be reconciled with a Creator God:
While Darwin had no problems reconciling natural selection with God, he did struggle with his religious beliefs, particularly with the idea a benevolent God who would create a world full of suffering and pain. He didn’t give up the idea of God as the ultimate lawgiver; he didn't identify as an atheist. He called himself agnostic. His own issues with God had nothing to do with evolution and everything to do with evil in the world.
Charles Darwin was no monster. He was a man. Like many people, the pain and sadness in the world caused him to doubt God, to question if He was really there. He spent his youth in religious training and even sought to find God in science. And maybe, just maybe, he did.
[1] Bertrand Russell, A History of Western Philosophy
No comments:
Post a Comment